2010-02-18, 03:11 AM
Your (Todd) taking a first stab at it is as legitimate as anyone. You're not an agent of From' etc. If you created a DD page out of whole cloth it would qualify as suspect/advertisement.
I won't write a page (never much been my thing) but I will try to keep whatever is there within basic Wikipedia guidelines as long as that doesn't involve tracking down/citing "sources" etc.
It's easy to make an argument that Som is relevant, and no more than a passing mention would make sense in the context of a KF page... however since it was really late coming to the English speaking world it's best to phrase a Som page in terms of a revival of interest or whatever and subsequent developments I think rather than pegging it immediately from the straight forward software angle.
You should mention important milestone projects in passing, but relegate most games to a "List of Sword of Moonlight games" page and their own pages where applicable.
If you keep pages impersonal and encyclopedic there should be no grounds for dismissing them. If a page is important to you, "watch" it, and if a motion to remove or whatever is raised, if you get in on the talk page and show you're trying to meet the guideline demands people will probably help you and ease off their delete triggers.
I won't write a page (never much been my thing) but I will try to keep whatever is there within basic Wikipedia guidelines as long as that doesn't involve tracking down/citing "sources" etc.
It's easy to make an argument that Som is relevant, and no more than a passing mention would make sense in the context of a KF page... however since it was really late coming to the English speaking world it's best to phrase a Som page in terms of a revival of interest or whatever and subsequent developments I think rather than pegging it immediately from the straight forward software angle.
You should mention important milestone projects in passing, but relegate most games to a "List of Sword of Moonlight games" page and their own pages where applicable.
If you keep pages impersonal and encyclopedic there should be no grounds for dismissing them. If a page is important to you, "watch" it, and if a motion to remove or whatever is raised, if you get in on the talk page and show you're trying to meet the guideline demands people will probably help you and ease off their delete triggers.